Send tips to Community Media Worskhop
NEWSTIPS HOME | About | Follow on Twitter @ChicagoNewstips

Aguijon Theater hosts Elena Poniatowska

Renowned Mexican journalist Elena Poniatowska will discuss the role of women in Latin American literature, Saturday at 1 p.m. at the National Museum of Mexican Art.

It’s part of the celebration of the 20th anniversary of Aguijon Theater, a company committed to creating Spanish-language theater that addresses social concerns.  (Originally founded as a traveling company housed at Truman College, the theater has occupied its own space in Belmont-Cragin since 1999.) 

Saturday evening Poniatowska will participate in a gala celebration of the anniversary featuring dinner, drinks, music and performances, also at NAMA, 1852 W. 19th Street.  Info at 773-637-5899.

‘Revolt on Goose Island’

Concerned about equipment being hauled off from the Republic Windows and Doors plant, workers there set up a surveillance team last November — and sitting outside a truckyard southwest of the city on a cold night, watching some loaded trailers, they came up with a plan to occupy the factory.  Alternet has an excerpt from Kari Lydersen’s new book, Revolt on Goose Island.

Studs gets an award

The National Radio Hall of Fame decides to induct the late Studs Terkel, after failing to ever nominate him while he was alive.  WFMT critic-at-large Andrew Patner isn’t impressed.

I.F. Stone – spy?

Like Studs Terkel, I.F. Stone distinguished himself by standing up against the 1950s Red Scare when few had the guts to do so.  And like Studs, this has earned him the ongoing enmity of the thought police.

Eric Alterman does a fine job debunking charges in a forthcoming book (recently previewed in Commentary) that Stone was a Soviet spy.  But facts matter little in such cases, and it’s likely that a significant sector of the opinion-mongering class will henceforth accept the tale and dismiss Stone as a fraud.

This kind of thing requires a deliberate disregard of what Stone the journalist actually wrote, as I tried to demonstrate in a comment* on last year’s New York Times smear (apology: it’s missing a quotation mark).  The facts of the matter are welcome, but no one who’s read much of I.F. Stone will be surprised; they know the bedrock independence of his spirit, which like that of Studs, was utterly and completely free and fearless.


* Here’s the comment (punctuation corrected):

An “admirer of Stalin”? Biographer Robert C. Cottrell notes that on the Soviet show trials of 1934, Stone wrote that the Stalinist regime was adopting the tactics of “Fascist thugs and racketeers.” In 1935, in a piece called “Hobgoblins in Moscow,” he wrote: “No government, no matter what its principles, can shut off free speech and deny legal processes without suffering from it. The checks and balances of free discussion can alone keep government efficient and servant rather than the ruler of the people.” In 1939, at the time of the Hitler-Stalin pact, he wrote that of “a new Catholicism…growing up in Communism and directed from Moscow, with its own Pope and its own heretics, bitterly persecuted and pursued.” In 1948, “I can’t help cheering for Tito, and when socialism comes I’ll fight for the right to spit in the nearest bureaucrat’s eye….I know if the Communists came to power I’d soon find myself eating cold kasha in a concentration camp in Kansas gubernya.”


The Gwendolyn Brooks Center at Chicago State University celebrates National Poetry Month with a day-long festival Saturday featuring “giants in the literary world” including Achy Obejas, Colin Channer, Willie Perdomo, Nnedi Okorafor, and Major Jackson.  Readings and panel discussions are free; poetry and fiction workshops cost $50.  April 18, 9 a.m. to 10 p.m., at the student union at 95th and King.

Franklin Rosemont

It was quite a shock to find Franklin’s picture on the obituary page.  He was a lovely man, big and gentle, bearded and bespectacled, with eyes that always seemed to twinkle with humor and shine with something much deeper.  His writing was rich, involving a sustained attention to fascinating historical and biographical detail along with a constant sense of irony and, at the very root, sheer joy and delight.

I met Franklin and Penelope in 1986 when we were putting together an issue of Haymarket newspaper dedicated to the actual Haymarket centennial; he contributed a piece on Haymarket and the Charles H. Kerr Company (which was founded the same year as the “riot”).  Back then we were young people who shared an appreciation of the importance of radical history.  Now it turns out that as an activist and historian, Franklin himself was an important historical link in the counterculture he celebrated, as he traced the connections from the Wobblies and Chicago’s “hobohemia,” through the beats and ’60s movements — and always, both Franklin and Penelope (they were always together) were seeking out its newest manifestations.

He and Penelope quietly led the Kerr Company on an amazing revival, publishing scores of invaluable books in the past couple decades.  (The Kerr Co. website lists a few.)  His own books include a major biography of Joe Hill, a collection of his surrealist writings, “Revolution in the Service of the Marvelous,” and his collection of reminiscences of the Dil Pickle (Franklin always insisted on the original spelling, with one ‘l’) by 41 of the club’s associated poets, artists, hoboes and anarchists.  He also co-edited “Danicin’ in the Streets,” an anthology from the Rebel Worker, the newspaper put out by a group of young Chicago Wobblies in the 1960s which Franklin edited.  And he wrote two books of poetry: “Lamps Hurled at the Stunning Algebra of Ants” and “Penelope.”

I have a few Kerr books where Franklin’s long, wonderful introductions are my favorite part.  I also share his love of the old typography and graphic arts (and cartoons).  For him it came naturally, as the son, grandson and great-grandson of printers; his father played a big role in Local 16 of the International Typographical Union.  Luckily, here’s Franklin’s own biographical sketch, prepared for a reunion of the Young People’s Socialist League.

Burnham Plan: a critical view

Jane Addams and the women of Hull House might have something to add to the discussions now swirling around the centennial of Daniel Burnham’s Plan of Chicago.

They weren’t consulted at the time — though if they had been, the plan could have been much more comprehensive. And more attention to their ideas about addressing Chicago’s problems might have saved us a lot of trouble (and money) over the past century.

That’s the premise of a forthcoming book — entitled “What Would Jane Say?” — which imagines conversations among settlement house workers and other progressives of the day on aspects of the Burnham plan. A reading will be staged Thursday by the author, longtime Chicago activist Jan Metzger, joined by her colleagues from the Center for Neighborhood Technology (details below).

Today the Burnham plan is lauded for proposing large-scale planning on a regional basis and for promoting the lakefront and forest preserves. Many of its central proposals, however — the gaudy “civic center” first and foremost — lent themselves to vivid diagrams but were simply “too grandiose” to be accomplished, Metzger says. As a whole, she says, the plan is “solely for the benefit of businessmen and completely at taxpayer expense.”

“It was a promotional package,” she says. “That’s why the pictures are so spectacular.”

Nothing about neighborhoods

Read today, the Plan of Chicago resembles nothing so much as Chicago 2016′s Olympic bid book — high-soaring rhetoric which glosses over contentious issues (the only mention of “slum conditions” is in the middle of a section on widening streets) while predicting a glorious future, if only the citizenry can be inspired to rise to it.

The plan includes “almost nothing about Chicago’s neighborhoods,” and its transportation chapter is mainly about moving freight more efficiently, Metzger says. Amenities were aimed at the wealthy. The discussion of the lakefront stresses yachting, while Burnham’s own ideas about restaurants of varying price levels and transit to get working people to the lake were deleted from the published plan, she says.

Metzger suspects that most folks who are “laudatory and uncritical” have never read the plan’s appendix. “If you read that, an entirely different meaning emerges,” she says. “It’s about the legal implications of the plan, mainly what kinds of projects are eligible for taxpayer support, and how to use eminent domain.”

To the businessmen’s plea for taxpayer support, she contrasts the accomplishments of the “city-building women” of Hull House and other settlement houses. “They were making major progress in actually improving people’s lives, and they did it with very modest investments.”

And to their gathering of the wealthiest men in Chicago — “their idea of diversity was having someone from every club at the table” — she contrasts the women’s ability to join people of every nationality, from the richest to the poorest.

Hot house of innovation

Hull House was something of a hot house for urban innovation, intensely focused on the most troubled district in the city, with a strong practical approach. They established day care, a kindergarten, afterschool programs, and adult education, along with a library, a museum of labor, a book bindery, an art studio, a music school and orchestra, and much more. They built the first playground in Chicago, and went on to found the Playground Association of America, which held its first conference in Chicago in 1907.

Settlement house workers also grappled directly with the kind of city problems that the Burnham plan glossed over. Florence Kelley was the state’s first factory inspector, and helped win sweatshop and child labor laws. And after reporting on inadequate garbage collection which bred rats and disease in alleys where children played, Jane Addams was made sanitary inspector of the 19th ward. She and members of the Hull House Women’s Association filed 1,000 complaints in the first year.

Their programs didn’t hinge on taxpayer support, either. When the state legislature agreed children should no longer be housed in adult jails and tried in adult courts — but failed to provide funding for a juvenile court and detention center — Addams enlisted a number of wealthy women who financed the new institutions through their first seven years. A low-budget effort by settlement houses to set up tents with hammocks where children sick from spoiled milk could be nursed to health — and their mothers educated in prevention — reduced summer infant mortality by 18 percent between 1903 and 1909.

Maps and Papers

Hull House also conducted extensive research, digging deep into neighborhood conditions — just the kind of thing you might expect of “comprehensive” city planners. Using the new method of statistical mapping, Hull House studied overcrowding, truancy, typhoid fever, addiction, infant mortality, and sanitation.

In 1895 they published Hull House Maps and Papers, an incredibly rich and detailed document, mapping ethnicity and wages for each household in the district and including papers on sweatshops, child laborers, workers wages and expenses, labor organization, and county institutions for the indigent. Papers on the Bohemian and Italian communities are by editors of ethnic newspapers.

Indeed, the settlement house movement was deeply involved in a debate at the birth of urban planning over its proper purview — should it deal exclusively with physical layout (and aim for the City Beautiful) or address social conditions? Metzger points out that the first meeting of the National Conference on City Planning (also in 1909, in Washington DC) was organized by Mary Simkhovitch, a New York settlement house leader.

Her campaign on congestion had focused on its social and economic causes and called for parks, schools, playgrounds, and transit, along with housing law reform. She believed neighborhood plans should form the basis of city plans, and residents should participate in planning — including poor immigrants. But before long the NCCP was entirely dominated by architects, engineers and lawyers; Simkhovitch went on to found the National Housing Association in 1911.

(The tide may be turning, though: Metzger notes that Chicago Metropolis 2020, launched by the same Commercial Club that sponsored Burnham’s plan, has a “fundamentally different approach — they start with education, they talk about reducing segregation, they talk about public health.”)

Little plans

Metzger scoffs at Burnham’s edict to “make no little plans.” It’s a philosophy that has given us expensive megaprojects which reinforced inequities and turned out to be unsustainable: miles of high-rise housing projects; massive urban renewal projects separating homes, jobs, and shopping; neighborhoods demolished to build expressways to the suburbs. “All of which would have been anathema to Jane Addams and her friends,” she says. (She also thinks Addams would have hated having a tollway named for her.)

“No little plans” has given us a history of planning which is done to people rather than with them. Metgzer contrasts the approach to assimilating immigrants by the Hull House women — based on educating, organizing and empowering them — with Burnham’s, which sought “to intimidate them by the grandeur of our monuments to ourselves, so they’d stop acting like immigrants.”

Along with her own community-level involvement in affordable housing and schools — she served on Mayor Washington’s 1987 commission which launched Chicago’s school reform — Metzger worked for years with CNT’s Chicagoland Transportation and Air Quality Commission, focused on involving communities in planning their own future. She’s also served on the board of Association House, the social service agency descended from a settlement house.

Her book is written as a series of conversations by small groups drawn from about a hundred historical figures in the settlement house movement, women’s networks, and progressive supporters. Based in many places on their own prolific writings, the characters meet to discuss Burnham’s plan for parks, transportation, and the central business district, with further chapters on what’s missing: education, housing and neighborhood development, public health, justice, immigrants and labor.

The title is a bow to Addam’s prominence, but one of the book’s goals is to highlight the overlooked contributions of many other women city-builders in Chicago history.

Metzger and other CNT staffers will stage a reading of one of the chapters this Thursday, March 26, at 5:30 p.m. at the Center for Neighborhood Technology, 2125 W. North. (Reservations are requested at 773-269-4031 or Publication by Claremont Press is expected later this spring.

Parent activists

What motivates some parents to go beyond advocating for improvements in their children’s classrooms and schools and fight for systemic changes across all of Chicago’s public schools?  That’s the question addressed in Tania Giordani’s new book, “All Children Are Our Children: The Motivation of Parent Advocates.

Giordani, who graduated from CPS, taught there, and now has children in the system, says she was particularly struck by the parents of high school seniors who kept fighting for changes which, if won, would come too late to help their own children.

She let parent activists tell their own stories, talking with parents who were involved beyond their own LSCs in community and citywide school reform groups.  One of their biggest concerns was equal access to quality education, Giordani says, which often meant “just fighting for simple things, like every child having a book, going to a school where all the teachers are certified, not continuously having substitute teachers.”

One thing many had in common was involvement in church, she says.

“To me these people are heroes,” she says.  “They’re like the activists of the ’50s and ’60s, they’re concerned about the entire community.”

Giordani teaches at Columbia College and the College of Lake County and is active in Grand Boulevard Federation’s Peer Parent Education Network.  Contact her at

Get Newstips in Your Inbox!

Enter your email address:

Subscribe in a reader

Newstips Archives


Add to Technorati Favorites

RSS Nonprofit Communicator

  • An error has occurred, which probably means the feed is down. Try again later.

RSS Chicago is the World

  • Telling people’s stories, an ethnic media success September 2, 2015
        By Stephen Franklin Community Media Workshop   A 3-year-old child died on a plane from Chicago to Poland. This, Magdalena Pantelis instantly knew, was a story her readers would care about. But she needed more detail to write about it for the Polish Daily News, the nation’s oldest daily newspaper in Polish, founded Jan. […]




CAN TV is a network that belongs to the people of Chicago.  For updates on local programs, and live, timely coverage of community events, sign up at