Apr 14, 2013 0
CPS claims this year — as it has in past closings — that all students in closing schools will end up at better schools.
As the Sun-Times and Tribune both report, that doesn’t seem to be the case. According to the Trib, whose analysis included several schools for which the Sun-Times couldn’t find data, nearly half of closing schools will send their students to schools with the same performance rating.
By my count, at 28 closing schools — more than half of the 53 on the list — students will be transferred to schools that are on academic probation.
The Sun-Times points out that eight receiving schools actually have lower test scores than the schools they’re absorbing students from. (This includes four receiving schools that have higher performance ratings but lower ISAT composite scores than the sending schools, which tells you something about CPS’s performance policy; Matt Farmer tells you more here.)
In many cases, the “better school” claim is a shell game. That’s where you see one school “closing” and another school with better scores moving out of its own building and into the “closed” school.
‘The numbers don’t work’
So, on the North Side, Stockton, a Level-3 school (on probation), is “closing” and its students are “moving into” Courtenay, a Level-2 (“in good standing”) school. But they’ll stay the same building. The Courtenay building is closing, and its students and staff will be sent to the old Stockton building.
Courtenay is now a small school that takes students who apply from across the city. No longer. Courtenay will now take on Stockton’s attendance boundaries.
With about 250 Courtenay students joining Stockton’s 450 students, what this really means is that Courtenay is closing but its administrators are being shifted to Stockton, along with its name. But with much less space.
Both schools have huge special ed populations — Courtenay’s is 33 percent, Stockton’s is 30 percent — and both have large ELL student populations, which have their own, less stringent legal class size limits. So they really don’t have as much room as CPS thinks they do, since the district’s calculations ignore special ed and ELL space requirements.
“Stockton has four or five empty rooms,” said Wendy Katten of Raise Your Hand, who’s visited many of the closing schools (and found much detail that’s lost in CPS’s decision-making process). “But they’re getting what — ten new homerooms? And both schools have huge special ed populations, which CPS is still not factoring in.”
So class sizes will go up, even as two distinct student populations with special needs are merged.
It looks like, rather than liberating students who are “trapped in failing schools,” Emanuel and company are setting up yet another school for failure.