Medicare – Chicago Newstips by Community Media Workshop Chicago Community Stories Mon, 14 Jul 2014 17:31:05 +0000 en-US hourly 1 Seniors plan civil disobedience to protest Social Security cuts Sun, 06 Nov 2011 22:15:16 +0000 Joined by hundreds of supporters from community and advocacy groups – and from Occupy Chicago – dozens of seniors will block traffic Monday morning to protest proposed cuts to Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid.

Following a rally and march starting at Dearborn and Adams at 10:15 a.m. on Monday, November 7, they’ll blockade the intersection of Jackson and Clark outside the Federal Plaza at 11:30 a.m..

The groups will meet later with Senator Durbin and members of the local congressional delegation “to demand a federal budget that strengthens the social safety net for low-income families” and that leaders “solve the revenue crisis by raising taxes on millionaires and closing loopholes for banks and big corporations,” according to a release.

According to reports, both Democrats and Republicans on the Senate “Supercommittee” considering a deficit reduction deal have proposed cuts to Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid.

Both party’s proposals include cutting cost-of-living increases for Social Security, though costs for seniors are known to rise at a higher rate than for others.  (See the Strengthen Social Security coalition’s materials on the supercommittee and on Social Security’s COLA.)

‘Very, very angry’

“I am saddened and very, very angry at the prospect of elected officials even considering cuts to Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, or HUD programs,” writes Ruth Long, 85, of the Jane Addams Senior Caucus, in a statement.

She notes that as a young black woman in the South in the 1940s, the only job open to her was as a domestic – which was not covered by Social Security.  Her employer at a bakery in Chicago didn’t report her earnings to Social Security, and when she was forced to stop working due to health issues, Medicaid and SSI “rescued” her.

“How can legislators look at themselves and their families in the face while considering this evil deed?”  she asks.  “I am one among many senior citizens standing on the brink of despair, because we feel abandoned by the very people we worked hard in our communities to put in their respective political offices.”

A warning to Democrats

Serving on President Obama’s deficit commission last year, Durbin reversed his previous opposition to raising the age to qualify for Social Security.  As part of a senatorial “Gang of Six” earlier this year he endorsed reducing Social Security benefits and heavy cuts in Medicaid and Medicare.

And while he promised to oppose  Social Security cuts during his campaign, this summer President Obama backed raising the retirement age, reducing benefits, and cutting Medicaid and Medicare as part of a deficit reduction deal.

The Campaign for America’s Future warns Democratic politicians that they “are courting political disaster.”

“At a time when American’s are demonstrating in cities and towns across the country against growing inequality and the economic damage done by an out of control banking system, leaks from the Super Committee reveal that representatives of both parties are proposing immediate and irresponsible cuts to Medicare, Social Security and Medicaid,” according to a statement from CAF.

“The undemocratic Super Committee should be focusing how we repair the massive unemployment imposed on the 99 percent of Americans by economic policies designed to favor the top 1 percent of Americans. They should not be sending the bill for this economic devastation to the millions of American who depend — or will depend — on the crucial health care [and] Social Security systems.”

Concern over Medicare, Social Security Sun, 22 Feb 2009 23:08:34 +0000 Advocates for retirees are “keeping a watchful eye” on tomorrow’s White House summit on fiscal responsibility, said Steve Pittman of the Illinois Alliance of Retired Americans.

Concern has been heightened by mixed messages from the Obama administration and especially by a major effort to reduce retirement and medical benefits by groups warning of an impending “entitlement crisis.”

“It’s a good idea to start looking at a long term plan,” Pittman said. “But if it’s to answer the call of people saying we have to cut back programs like Social Security and Medicare because that’s the only way we will have a sound economy, that’s just flat wrong.”

While President Obama has said Social Security’s long-term shortfalls can be addressed by raising the cap on income subject to payroll taxes, his budget director, Peter Orszag, authored a 2005 plan to raise Social Security taxes and reduce benefits.

And while Orszag emphasizes that Socal Security’s problems are decades away and rising health costs are the immediate issue, many of Monday’s participants have worked to conflate the issues and push Social Security cuts.

Most prominent among them is former Commerce Secretary Peter Peterson, who is spending $1 billion of his Wall Street fortune to convince the public there’s an “entitlement crisis.” He’s been joined by a range of think tanks, including the Heritage Foundation and the Brookings Institute, and backed by a Congressional coalition.

With recent losses of stock market and home values by retirees and people nearing retirement, “there’s no way the solution is to cut health care benefits or the one retirement benefit that people can count on, which is Social Security,” said Pittman.

 It’s the recent experiment in financing employee retirement accounts via the stock market that’s collapsed, he said. “When the individual savings and employee pension legs of the [retirement] stool begin to wobble, you don’t start sawing on the third leg.”

Last week, Roger Hickey of the Campaign for America’s Future told The Hill he’s worried that “in an effort to get bipartisan consensus, the White House could get locked into a path of austerity” and end up cutting benefits.

Orszag told Politico that the next phase of health care reform would involve finding efficiencies in Medicare and Medicaid, in order to encourage broader health cost containment. Politico reported: “Critics see the call for efficiency as easier said than done, and largely a smokescreen for simply saving money for cutting federal payments to doctors and hospitals.”

Sid Bild of the health care task force of Metro Seniors in Action is concerned about “changes that would result in Medicare providing fewer and fewer payments and fewer and fewer services,” ultimately undermining support for the program.

He adds: “The insurance companies and the private health care industry are always looking for the privatization of Medicare.”

Notes Pittman: “If anything, Medicare shows a path forward as we talk about health care reform. You won’t find any plan in the private sector where 98 cents out of a dollar goes to care.”

Indeed, one recent study showed that Medicare has controlled costs much better than private insurers over the past 25 years, and the public Medicare plan is much better than containing costs than privately-operated, publicly-subsidized Medicare Advantage plans.

Bild advocates “Medicare For All,” under which “all the costs would be put under analysis.” Currently Medicare bases payments for services on what’s “usual and customary” in a region; pharmaceutical companies refuse to allow examination of costs, claiming it’s proprietary information, while making “exorbitant claims” about the cost of research, he said.

One huge, immediate saving could be accomplished by eliminating the Medicare Part D drug benefit, which subsidizes private companies, and placing the benefit under Medicare administration, he said. According to economist Paul Krugman, “the unfunded liabilities of Medicare Part D alone are twice those of Social Security.”

Last month Rep. Jan Schakowski introduced a bill that would establish a Medicare-administered drug plan alongside private Part D plans. The bill would also permit Medicare to bargain with drug companies over bulk purchases, which the legislation establishing Part D prohibited.

That would provide a cheaper alternative — many seniors can’t afford Part D, according to Sen. Richard Durbin, who plans companion legislation. And if half of all Medicare beneficiaries signed up, it would save the federal government an estimated $20 billion a year.

The housing crash and family wealth Wed, 09 Jul 2008 21:22:29 +0000

If house prices stay the same through 2009, the median household headed by a person between the ages of 45 and 54 will have 24.7 percent less wealth than a similiar household had in 2004, according to a new report on the housing crash and family wealth from the Center for Economic and Policy Research.

If real house prices fall another 10 percent, these folks will see a 34.6 percent loss in wealth — while families in the 18-to-34 age range will lose 67.6 percent.

This analysis should prompt serious re-examination of policy proposals to cut Social Security and Medicare for near retirees, according to Dean Baker of CEPR: “Policies that perhaps could have been justified at the peak of the housing bubble make much less sense now that tens of millions of near-retirees have just seen most of their wealth disappear.”

See CEPR’s press release.

MS Patients: Medicare Part D ‘Too Expensive’ Mon, 08 May 2006 06:00:00 +0000 Medicare’s new Part D drug benefit is having an unintended side effect — people with disabilities, including thousands living with Multiple Sclerosis, have been cut off from patient assistance programs (PAPs) formerly offered by drug companies, and now cannot afford necessary medications, advocates say.

The Illinois Chapter of the National Multiple Sclerosis Society and the Chicago-based research and advocacy group Health and Disability Advocates are organizing people with MS to press drug companies to readmit Medicare beneficiarides to programs which offered subsidized drugs prior to Part D.

An estimated 20,000 Illinois residents have Multiple Sclerosis.

Under Part D the specialized and premium medications needed by people with MS are in the top tiers of drug plan formularies, with copays that can total hundreds of dollars a month. That contrasts much smaller subsidized copays under patient assistance plans.

For people with incomes just over the limits for state and federal assistance — which includes a large proportion of people with MS depending on Social Security disability benefits — once they reach Part D’s “donut hole” where they must pay 100 percent of drugs costs, “it’s too expensive,” said Jackie Guthrie of the National MS Society. “People haven’t got the money.”

Many are forced to forego disease-modifying medications which can prevent the progression of the disease, Guthrie said — heightening their risk of developing a range of disabilities.

“Medicare Part D doesn’t work for people with high drug needs who don’t qualify for extra help,” said John Coburn of HDA.

Drug companies cut Medicare beneficiaries from their patient assistance programs following an advisory from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services last November that PAPs “present a heightened risk of fraud and abuse” under anti-kickback laws.

Pressured by members of Congress, HHS recently issued a new advisory setting forth ways companies could reopen their PAPs. But getting companies to do so “has been like pulling teeth,” said Coburn.

“I don’t think they were looking for an excuse to drop their programs — I think the government’s guidelines scared them,” he said. He added that the patient assistance programs were very inexpensive for drug companies. “Now it’s just a matter of getting the wheels to move,” he said.

Last month the Springfield Journal Register reported MS patient Roxanne Metz of Jacksonville, Illinois, was told the Berlex Laboratories was resuming a foundation program which had provided her with betaseron at subsidized prices. Her out-of-pocket expenses had risen from $1,200 a year under the old program to $4,500 a year under Part D, the paper reported.

But Guthrie said Metz has received nothing in writing and is now growing “leery.”

This week Illinois residents with MS will gather in Springfield for a town meeting on patient assistance programs and Part D, part of an effort to raise awareness about the issue and pressure Congress and drug companies to make reinstating the programs a priority. Sponsored by the National MS Society and HDA’s Make Medicare Work Coalition, the town meeting takes place Friday, May 12, 2 to 4 p.m. in the auditorium of the Springfield Howlett Building, 501 S. 2nd Street.

Medicare Drug Plan: More Trouble Thu, 30 Mar 2006 06:00:00 +0000 With a new round of difficulties expected when the new Medicare Part D drug program’s transitional period ends April 1, consumer advocates have launched a “Campaign to Fix the Part D Disaster” and released a study showing that Illinois seniors and taxpayers could save billions of dollars if Medicare was allowed to negotiate prices with drug companies.

Meanwhile, service providers in the Make Medicare Work Coalition, consisting of hundreds of public and nonprofit agencies which have been counseling seniors and people with disabilities regarding drug plan options, will hold a summit meeting March 31 in Oak Brook.

On April 1 the plan’s transitional period ends and insurance companies will stop paying for drugs not on their formularies. “We expect to see a spike in issues when people realize their plans don’t cover all the drugs they take,” said John Coburn of Health and Disability Advocates, one of the conveners of the Make Medicare Work Coalition.

Many will have to undertake the effort of filing for appeals and exceptions, and some of these will end up in federal court, said Lynda DeLaforgue of Citizen Action/Illinois, which is spearheading the Fix Part D coalition.

“So we’re back in an HMO-type situation, with insurance companies overruling doctors’ prescriptions and making medical decisions for patients,” DeLaforgue said.

Also in April, thousands of seniors who qualify for Medicare’s “extra help” program will be automatically enrolled in drug plans, potentially repeating the chaos that ensued from automatic enrollment of low-income seniors in January.

DeLaforgue said many seniors are now experiencing “sticker shock” and finding themselves in the plan’s “donut hole” — where they pay for 100 percent of drug costs — much sooner than they expected.

Us. Representatives Jan Schakowsky (9), Danny Davis (7), and Dan Lipinski (3) joined groups representing consumers, seniors, and labor at the launch of the Campaign to Fix Part D on March 27. They released a report by the Institute for America’s Future which says Congress’s failure to provide a Medicare-administered drug plan option and its prohibition on negotiating drug prices will cost Medicare beneficiaries and taxpayers in Illinois $32 billion over the next decade.

Most of that amount comes from higher drug prices, said Jeff Cruz, co-author of the report. The current program “does nothing to keep prices down, in fact it encourages them to raise prices,” Cruz said, noting that the Congressional Budget Office has projected drug price increases of 8 percent a year, more than double the rate of inflation. Negotiated prices would keep increases closer to the rate of inflation, he said.

Cruz cited a Consumer’s Union report projecting that by next year, the average Part D participant who had no previous drug coverage will be paying more out-of-pocket for drugs than they did in 2003 without the plan.

The Campaign to Fix Part D is calling on Congress to require Medicare to negotiate drug prices, establish a Medicare-administered plan as an alternative to private plans, and prohibit insurers from dropping medications from their formularies during enrollment terms. The group is calling for extending the deadline for enrollment and closing the “donut hole” in Part D coverage.

DeLaforgue notes bipartisan concerns about Part D raised in the recent congressional budget debate, with resolutions passed by the Senate advocating extending enrollment and negotiating prices. She said President Bush has opposed extending the deadline and House leadership has “dug in their heels” on any changes in the plan.

“We will be working in Illinois congressional districts this summer,” she said, listing Mark Kirk(10), Jerry Weller (11), and Speaker Dennis Hastert (14) as “members of congress who especially need to hear from us.”

Meanwhile, hundreds of service providers are signed up for the Make Medicare Work Coalition’s 2006 summit, 9 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. on Friday, March 31 at the Doubletree Hotel in Oak Brook. The coalition is a collaborative project of Health and Disability Advocates, Progress Center for Independent Living and the Suburban Area Agency on Aging.

So far Part D is a good deal for people who didn’t have coverage previously, said HDA’s Coburn. “It’s better than paying 100 percent yourself,” he said. For people who had coverage, especially low-income people and people who are sick or have disabilities, “the transition is extremely rough,” he said. “It’s the most vulnerable who have been impacted most negatively.”

For Coburn, one “untold story” is the role of social service agencies who have been consumed with counseling seniors and people with disabilities. While Medicare has provided some agencies with funding for counseling, many nonprofits have taken on the task without funding.

“We all had full workloads before this,” he said. “At one point we were doing more than just counseling people on drug plans.”